A small however rising variety of staff are asking for cryptocurrency as a type of compensation. Whether or not an alternative to wages or as a part of an incentive package deal, providing cryptocurrency as compensation has change into a approach for some corporations to distinguish themselves from others. In a aggressive labor market, this want to supply progressive types of compensation is comprehensible. However any firm occupied with cryptocurrency wants to pay attention to the dangers concerned, together with regulatory uncertainties and market volatility.
Type of Cost – Money or Negotiable Instrument
The federal Honest Labor Requirements Act requires employers to pay minimal and additional time wages in “money or negotiable instrument payable at par.” This has lengthy been interpreted to incorporate solely fiat currencies—monies backed by a governmental authority. As non-fiat currencies, cryptocurrencies subsequently fall outdoors the FLSA’s definition of “money or negotiable instrument.” Because of this, an employer who chooses to pay minimal and/or additional time wages in cryptocurrency might violate the FLSA by failing to pay employees with an accepted type of compensation.
As well as, numerous state legal guidelines make the type of wage fee query much more tough. For instance, Maryland requires fee in United States foreign money or by test that “on demand is convertible at face worth into United States foreign money.” Pennsylvania requires that wages shall be made in “lawful cash of the USA or test.” And California prohibits compensation that’s made by means of “coupon, playing cards or different factor[s] redeemable…in any other case than in cash.” It’s largely unclear whether or not fee in cryptocurrency runs afoul of those state necessities.
Of notice, the U.S. Division of Labor (“DOL”) permits employers to fulfill FLSA minimal wage and additional time rules with foreign currency so long as the conversion to U.S. {dollars} meets the required wage thresholds. However neither the DOL nor courts have weighed in on whether or not sure cryptocurrencies (e.g., Bitcoin) are the equal, for FLSA functions, of a overseas foreign money.
Volatility Considerations
When in comparison with the reasonably steady worth of the U.S. greenback, the worth of cryptocurrencies is topic to giant fluctuations. Bitcoin, for instance, misplaced almost 83% of its worth in Might 2013, roughly 50% of its worth in March 2020, and lately misplaced after which gained 16% of its worth within the span of roughly quarter-hour sooner or later in February 2021.
Such volatility may give payroll distributors a nightmare and might, in some cases, result in the under-payment of wages or violation of minimal wage or additional time necessities beneath the FLSA.
Tax and Advantages Concerns
Other than wage and hour points, the fee of cryptocurrency implicates a number of tax and benefits-related points. The IRS considers digital currencies to be “property,” topic to capital positive aspects tax charges. It has additionally confirmed in steerage supplies that any fee to staff in a digital foreign money should be reported on a W-2 primarily based upon the worth of the foreign money in U.S. {dollars} on the time it was delivered to the worker. Which means cryptocurrency wage funds are topic to Federal earnings tax withholding, Federal Insurance coverage Contributions Act (FICA) tax, and Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) tax.
For 401k plan fiduciaries, the Division of Labor lately issued steerage that ought to function a stern warning to any fiduciary trying to make investments 401k funds into cryptocurrencies. Particularly, the DOL wrote: “[a]t this early stage within the historical past of cryptocurrencies, the Division has severe considerations in regards to the prudence of a fiduciary’s determination to reveal a 401(ok) plan’s contributors to direct investments in cryptocurrencies, or different merchandise whose worth is tied to cryptocurrencies.” Given the dangers inherent in cryptocurrency hypothesis, the DOL said that any fiduciary permitting such funding choices “ought to count on to be questioned [by the DOL] about how they’ll sq. their actions with their duties of prudence and loyalty in gentle of the dangers.”
Concerns for Employers
Given the mix of unsure and untested authorized dangers, employers ought to think about limiting cryptocurrency compensation fashions to funds that don’t implicate the FLSA or relevant state wage and hour legal guidelines. For instance, an employer may present an exempt worker’s base wage in U.S. {dollars} and any annual discretionary bonus in cryptocurrency.
Whether or not investing in cryptocurrencies themselves to pay staff or using a third-party to transform US {dollars} into cryptocurrency, employers also needs to keep abreast of the evolving tax and advantages steerage on this space.
In the end, the one factor that’s clear about cryptocurrency compensation is that any determination to supply such compensation to staff needs to be made with a cautious eye in the direction of the distinctive wage, tax, and benefits-related points implicated by these transactions.
Copyright © 2022, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP. All Rights Reserved.Nationwide Legislation Evaluation, Quantity XII, Quantity 101
Supply hyperlink
